Posts Tagged ‘carbon dioxide’
Fred Singer visits CSU and NIST in Colorado
Fred Singer, President of the Science and Environmental Policy Project and Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science at the University of Virginia, spoke at CSU (Colorado State University) in Ft. Collins on July 18th. Unfortunately the room was not set up to allow Fred to present his visual aids, so Fred made his presentation without his many interesting charts. I was fortunate enough to also attend Fred’s presentation at NIST Boulder Laboratories in Boulder the following day, so was able to see the charts he referred to at the CSU presentation.
Fred’s presentation was based mainly on his report published in 2008 titled “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate” (See Reference section below for link)
Fred highlighted the following major questions at the NIST presentation:
1. Is warming due to natural causes or anthropogenic (ie, due to human causes)? He described why this is both a Science issue and a Policy Issue.
2. Why is there a disparity between models? Using the data from 2007 IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) report there is a clear discrepancy between the Model results and “fingerprints” (observed patterns of warming).
3. What causes Climate Variability? In addition to greenhouse gasses, other factors like internal oscillations of the atmosphere-ocean system, influence of clouds and solar activity need to be considered.
Fred also commented on evidence of abuses of the peer review process at IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and the Michael Mann Hockey Stick Chart as examples that clearly calls for an assessment by the scientific community to evaluate their behavior. We suggest you view the presentations at the recent International Conference on Climate Change hosted by Heartland Institute. The theme of the conference was “Restoring the Scientific Method”. (See Reference section below for link)
At both presentations Fred commented on the global warming trend… yes, we are in a warming trend, however the current cycle is not unusual (for example: it was warmer during the Medieval Warm Period).
Chart from Roy Spencer’s Global Warming Website.

Also, this chart of global satellite-based temperatures shows a warming trend from 1910 thru 1940, then a cooling trend, increase beginning in 1975 with a “spike” in 1997… if CO2 was is a major contributor to warming then one would expect a steady increase in temperature over the last 100 years. Chart from page 5, “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate” paper by Fred Singer dated 2008

One more interesting chart, Global averaged satellite-based Temperature Chart for 1979 thru current year.
From Roy Spencer’s Global Warming Website
_ _
_ _
We agree with Fred’s conclusion stated in his 2008 report,
Our imperfect understanding of the causes and consequences of climate change means the science is far from settled. This, in turn, means proposed efforts to mitigate climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions are premature and misguided. Any attempt to influence global temperatures by reducing such emissions would be both futile and expensive.
Reference:
“Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate”, report by S. Fred Singer, dated 2008
Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (MIPCC), “Climate Change Reconsidered”, released June 2009.
Roy Spencer’s Global Warming Website ( www.drroyspencer.com)
Sixth International Conference on Climate Change hosted by Heartland Institute in Washington, D.C. on June 30 to July 1, 2011. The scientists who spoke at this conference are committed to restoring the scientific method. The conference theme was “Restoring the Scientific Method”.
http://climateconference.heartland.org/
Article in Colorodoan about Fred Singer’s presentation at CSU on July 18th, dated July 19, 2011.
How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff – great book to inform you how numbers can be used to fool you rather than inform.
Chicago Climate Exchange – Scaling Back Operations
The Chicago Climate Exchange is scaling back operations. The market for their only product, carbon emissions, basically worthless. Currently selling for 10 cents per tonne.

In May and June of 2008 the market was soaring. What a difference today!
Here are two articles for more information:
From Watts Up with That? “Chicago Climate Exchange drops 50%, new record low” and 21Century Wire “The Great Collapse of the Chicago Climate Exchange”
Greenpeace uses Facebook’s new data center in Prineville, Oregon to target the coal industry.
It seems the AGW (anthropogenic global warming ie human-caused) crowd still doesn’t “get it”. Using “global warming pollution” and calling coal a “dirty source of energy” presupposes some assumptions that have … for about 3 years now … and especially in the last year … been proved to be false. We call on the AGW crowd to do their homework and stop attacking “carbon”. We call on business to get some backbone and stop pandering to the “Green” folks … and defend the use of coal as a American-sourced low-cost fuel that makes sense to support the energy needs of America.
Some references about this attack by Greenpeace
Greenpeace International (Facebook page) calling for Facebook to use 100% renewable energy, click here to read article
Fox News Article dated Aug 2, 2010 “Greenpeace De-friends Facebook”, click here to read article.
Greenpeace International – article dated Aug 2 “Fox News takes a look at Facebook and Coal (Video)
For those who still think carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are causing unprecedented global warming and if we don’t switch to renewable energy (regardless of the cost), disaster is ahead … we recommend the following reading in addition to other articles on this web site.
Is the current global warming unusual?
This chart tells the story, for more information click here to see article at LongRangeWeather.com “Global Temperature Trends from 2500 B.C. to 2040 A.D.

Here’s an article from the Washington Times dated May 19, 2010 “Nero was hotter than Al Gore”
To quote part of the article..
The planet has never been warmer than it is right now, if you believe what global warming alarmists have to say. Mankind’s selfishness in producing “excessive” amounts of carbon dioxide has set us on a path toward global cataclysm, they insist. The problem with this tale is that it neither fits with the historical record nor with a growing body of scientific evidence.
Does increasing CO2 cause global warming?
This article by James Peden posted on The Middlebury Community Network website is a bit long but well worth you time to read.
Here are a few quotes from the Peden article
Co2 is a non-toxic, non-polluting, earth-friendly component that really is critical to our survival.This was the fundamental mistake that Mann, Al Gore, the Oscar boys, the Nobel Committee, the IPCC, and just about everyone else on the planet made at the beginning. They immediately assumed, noticing that CO2 levels and global temperatures had a pretty good correlation, that CO2 was the culprit, and was causing global temperatures to rise. In fact, it appears it was just the opposite: rising global temperatures caused increased CO2 level in the atmosphere.
Is the “science” settled?
Please take a look at this letter sent Dec 13, 2007 to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and signed by 100 Scientists. Numerous article point out the deficiencies in efforts to model the climate, the advice in this letter … focus on helping people adapt. “Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity’s real and pressing problems.”
Of course there are many more recent sources, we recommend watching the videos of presentations at the 4th Annual International Conference on Climate Change (meeting held in Chicago, IL on May 16-18, 2010) posted on the Heartland Institute website.
In addition to the fact that attacking coal has no justification based on science, environmentalists and legislators and bureaucrats are causing real harm by justifying huge subsidies and proposing unnecessary rules and regulations.
Read our article about the rule submitted by the EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) on December 15, 2009 relating to greenhouse gasses and hearing in the US Senate.
Here’s an article posted at OregonLive.com dated July 12, 2010
“Pacific Power customers face a ‘rate shock’ in 2011”
And finally, an interesting list of countries that now realize that renewable energy is a massive waste of taxpayer funds and has zero or negligible effect on CO2 emissions. Article found at The Carbon Sense Coalition (located in Australia) dated July 21, 2010 “Sunset for Subsidies” Read the rest of this entry »
US Senate fails to disapprove EPA rule related to greenhouse gases
On June 10, 2010 … the US Senate debated Joint Resolution 26 – a resolution to disapprove a rule submitted by the EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) on December 15, 2009 relating to greenhouse gasses. After over 6 hours of debate the US Senate voted against the resolution 53 to 47. You can view the entire session at CSpan Video Library
According to Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), because this (i.e., EPA action) is our worst option to reduce emissions and Congress needs time to develop a more appropriate solution, I have introduced a resolution of disapproval … I introduced this back in January … to halt the EPA’s regulations. My resolution does not affect the science behind the endangerment finding, but it will prevent the finding from being enforced through economy-wide regulations.
About the Opposition
Most of the comments by Senators opposing Resolution 26 were “red herrings” … about their confidence that the scientific findings were compelling, about fuel standards and about the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Instead of reasoned debate, we got political theatre! Did they read the bill?… did they read the EPA rule? … or did they use Barbara Boxer’s talking points to prepare their comments? Read the rest of this entry »
Americans for Prosperity – Regulation Reality Tour
Americans for Prosperity is hitting the road with their Regulation Reality Tour featuring the Carbon Cops who will issue a citation for anything from filling up your gas tank to using your heat or electricity.
The Tour will be in Colorado Apr 19-21. We will post additional information as it becomes available. Don’t miss this event!
Murkowski proposes an amendment to handcuff EPA

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is proposing an amendment to handcuff the EPA from exercising its full regulatory power. Read about this in a Wall Street Journal article. The purpose of the amendment would be to prohibit the use of funds to regulate or control carbon dioxide from any sources other than a mobile source or to treat carbon dioxide as a pollutant subject to certain regulations. Many environmental groups are opposing this legislation.
Here is an article dated Jan 19, 2010 in the Los Angeles Times